Completions

Skill catalog

Social cross-posting that actually fits each platform

One post idea, five platforms, two hundred locations. The aspect ratios, character limits, hashtag rules, and CTAs are all different. We adapt them automatically.

The problem

Multi-location social is not just about volume — it is about fit. Facebook wants 16:9 landscape and a CTA button. Instagram wants 1:1 or 9:16, 30-hashtag tail, and a Linktree CTA. TikTok wants vertical video and a different hook. X wants 280 characters and at most two hashtags. LinkedIn wants more text and a direct URL. A 200-location operator posting 8 times per week across 5 platforms is looking at 8,000 reformatting tasks per week. The social manager runs a quarterly batch. About 56% of locations end up with format drift across platforms at any given time — the Instagram caption written for Facebook, the LinkedIn post with TikTok hashtags, CTAs that go nowhere. Engagement drops because the post does not look native to the platform it landed on. Cross-posting platforms (Buffer, Hootsuite, Sprout, Later, Publer) send to every channel. Multi-platform automation (Repurpose.io, ContentStudio, Vista Social) repurposes content. None of them adapt per location with the right service mix, brand voice, and state rules.

What success looks like

Every post gets reformatted for every platform automatically — aspect ratio, character limit, hashtag rule, CTA format — while staying in your brand voice. Location-specific details (the actual services, the actual location URL, the actual offer running there) get swapped in. State-specific rules are applied. The post that lands on Instagram looks like an Instagram post; the post that lands on LinkedIn looks like a LinkedIn post; and they both feel like they came from the same brand. Format drift across the portfolio drops from around 56% to under 10%. Engagement rises because each post fits its platform.

How most operators solve this today

Three categories already handle cross-posting. None of them adapt per location with your brand voice and rules:

  • Social cross-posting platforms (Buffer, Hootsuite, Sprout Social, Later, Loomly, Publer, SocialBee, Sendible, MeetEdgar)

    $6 to $500+/user/month

    They send to every channel. The reformatting per platform — and per location — is still up to your team.

  • Multi-platform repurposing (Repurpose.io, OneUp, ContentStudio, Vista Social, Metricool, Tailwind, Crowdfire, SocialPilot)

    $8 to $300+/user/month

    Automates some format conversion. Per-location specifics and brand voice consistency are not their focus.

  • In-house social manager doing it by hand

    $60-110k/year manager + platform fees

    8,000 weekly reformatting tasks across 200 locations is impossible to keep current. The 56% drift rate is the result.

  • Build it in-house

    Senior engineer ($130-220k) + social manager ($60-110k) + four to twelve weeks for v1

    Meta Graph API plus LinkedIn API plus TikTok API plus brand voice plus per-location logic. Same drift problem at higher cost.

What changes when this is an agent skill

Every post idea is rendered into the format each platform expects, automatically. A draft for Tustin becomes: an Instagram post with the right aspect ratio and Tustin-specific hashtag mix; a Facebook post with the right CTA and landscape image; a TikTok caption with the right opening hook; an X post under 280 characters with at most two hashtags; a LinkedIn post with the long-form copy a LinkedIn audience expects. Tustin's actual service mix, current offers, and location URL get swapped in. Brand voice is checked on every variant before it ships. State rules are applied. The post that lands on each platform looks native to that platform and consistent with your brand across all of them. Every adaptation is logged with the source post, the platform-specific rules applied, and the location context — so the social manager can audit any specific publication without reconstructing the chain.

Agents that include this skill

Skills live inside agent rentals. To get this skill in production, hire any of the agents below — context-tuning at onboarding is included in the first month.

FAQ

How is this different from Buffer or Hootsuite?
Buffer and Hootsuite are great at scheduling and sending. The per-platform reformatting and per-location specifics are still your team's responsibility. We do that work.
How is this different from Repurpose.io or Vista Social?
Those handle some format conversion. They are not focused on adapting posts per location with your brand voice and state rules.
Do we have to switch our scheduling tool?
No. The system writes to your existing scheduler. Buffer, Hootsuite, Sprout, Later, Publer, SocialBee, and most enterprise schedulers are supported as the delivery layer.
Which platforms are supported?
Facebook, Instagram (feed, Stories, Reels), TikTok, X, LinkedIn, YouTube Shorts, Pinterest. New platforms get added as they reach meaningful audience scale.
What gets adapted per platform?
Aspect ratio (1:1, 9:16, 16:9), character limit, hashtag count and style, CTA format, opening hook, image or video crop. Each platform's rules are encoded once and applied per post.
How is brand voice kept consistent?
Brand voice is captured once as a spec your team approves. Every adapted variant is checked against the spec before publishing. Drafts that drift are flagged.
How are location-specific details swapped in?
Each location has its own services, offers, URL, and address. When the post is rendered for that location, the right details are inserted automatically.
How is history captured for auditing?
Every adaptation is logged with the source post, the platform-specific rules applied, the location context, and the brand voice check result. You can audit any specific publication later.

Hire one of the agents that includes this skill