Completions

Skill catalog

Product compliance + per-vertical catalog schema validation

Per-vertical catalog schema validation against FDA, FTC, state-AG, FINRA, OSHA, and Prop 65 rule libraries — at ingest, conflict-resolution, and emission time.

The problem

You sell supplements in California, cannabis in Massachusetts, beauty in Texas, and OTC pharma everywhere. FDA requires structure-function language for supplement claims. California state AG requires specific Prop 65 warnings. Massachusetts cannabis has its own dosage / efficacy language restrictions. FTC wants every claim substantiated.

Your Salsify license validates against Google Shopping spec — that catches typos and missing required fields but not "this supplement claim is FDA-actionable." Assent Compliance ($25,000-$200,000+/year — category leader), Source Intelligence ($25,000-$100,000+/year), 3E Company, Sphera, and Compliance & Risks cover supply-chain compliance (chemical inventory, REACH, RoHS, conflict minerals) at industrial scale. Veeva Vault ($25,000-$200,000+/year life sciences), Esko (packaging), and Reed Tech (FDA submissions) are deeply verticalized but isolated from marketing operations. Feedonomics, GoDataFeed, DataFeedWatch, and Channable validate marketplace formatting only. Your in-house VP-Regulatory at $120,000-$250,000/year reviews manually and is three weeks behind.

The gap is per-vertical catalog schema validation that loads operator-defined rule libraries (FDA structure-function, FTC substantiation, state-AG cannabis, FINRA suitability, OSHA chemical, Prop 65) and validates every catalog attribute at ingest, conflict-resolution, and emission time.

What success looks like

Per-vertical rule libraries (FDA structure-function, FTC claim substantiation, state-AG cannabis restrictions, FINRA suitability, OSHA chemical labeling, FCC RF compliance, California Prop 65, EU Cosmetic Regulation 1223/2009) compose with per-vertical-compliance-overlay and validate every catalog attribute at three gates.

At ingest time, multi-source-catalog-ingest results get validated before reaching the canonical graph. Non-compliant attributes route to a borderline-routing-style review queue.

At conflict-resolution time, catalog-conflict-resolution decisions get re-validated. Resolution that picks a non-compliant source surfaces for review.

At emission time, catalog-change-event-emission validates against each target channel's compliance requirements. Cannabis-state-specific variants emit only to in-jurisdiction subscribers. Per-state Prop 65 warnings flow to California-bound product variants only.

Regulatory-change-monitoring keeps rule libraries current. Every validation decision ties to versioned-product-history for audit-defensible regulator-inquiry response. Assent Compliance and Veeva Vault remain useful for their respective deep-vertical operations; this skill covers the AI-content-output product-catalog validation layer.

How most operators solve this today

Six tiers of incumbent tools — none provide per-vertical catalog schema validation across FDA, FTC, state-AG, and FINRA rule libraries at every catalog-data gate.

  • Enterprise product-compliance suites (Assent Compliance, Source Intelligence, 3E Company, Sphera, Compliance & Risks)

    $25,000-$200,000+/year

    Built for supply-chain compliance (chemical inventory, REACH, RoHS, conflict minerals) at industrial scale. Light-touch on AI-content-output validation.

  • PIM-bundled compliance modules (Salsify, Productsup, Akeneo, inriver, Syndigo)

    Bundled with PIM license

    Validates against marketplace spec (Google Shopping required fields, Meta Catalog format). Per-vertical regulatory schema (FDA structure-function, FTC substantiation, state-AG cannabis, FINRA) requires custom configuration.

  • Per-vertical specialty compliance (Veeva Vault life sciences, Esko packaging, Reed Tech FDA, per-state cannabis vendors)

    $20,000-$200,000+/year

    Verticalized deeply but isolated from marketing operations. Does not validate AI-content-output product attributes against operator-defined rule libraries.

  • Marketplace-policy validation (Feedonomics, GoDataFeed, DataFeedWatch, Channable)

    $39-$5,000+/month

    Validates against marketplace formatting only (Google Merchant Center disapproval reasons, Meta Catalog errors). Not against operator-defined per-vertical compliance.

  • In-house regulatory FTE (VP-Regulatory / compliance counsel)

    $120,000-$250,000/year salary

    Single reviewer bottleneck. Manual review of product attributes against applicable regulations. Falls behind past 1,000 SKUs or 3+ regulated verticals.

  • DIY (Excel checklists + manual brand-manager review + occasional outside counsel review)

    Free

    Falls apart past 1,000 SKUs or 3+ regulated verticals. No audit trail; no programmatic enforcement.

What changes when this is an agent skill

The Completions catalog-per-vertical-schema-validation skill loads operator-defined per-vertical rule libraries — FDA structure-function for supplements + cosmetics, FTC claim substantiation, state-AG cannabis restrictions, FINRA suitability, OSHA chemical labeling, FCC RF compliance, California Prop 65, EU Cosmetic Regulation 1223/2009.

Validation runs at three gates: ingest (before raw attributes reach the canonical graph), conflict-resolution (after catalog-conflict-resolution picks a winning source), and emission (before catalog-change-event-emission fires).

Per-jurisdiction validation gates per-state-specific variants: cannabis dosage claims emit only to in-jurisdiction subscribers; Prop 65 warnings flow to California-bound variants only; per-state-AG-specific language surfaces correctly.

Regulatory-change-monitoring keeps rule libraries current. Every validation decision ties to versioned-product-history. Assent Compliance and Veeva Vault remain useful for deep-vertical operations; this skill covers the AI-content-output product-catalog validation layer that none of the incumbents address.

Agents that include this skill

Skills live inside agent rentals. To get this skill in production, hire any of the agents below — context-tuning at onboarding is included in the first month.

FAQ

What is product compliance for AI-generated catalog content?
Validating every product attribute (description, claim, label, ingredient, dosage, comparative claim) against applicable per-vertical regulations (FDA, FTC, state-AG, FINRA, OSHA, Prop 65) at ingest, conflict-resolution, and emission time.
How is this different from Assent Compliance or Source Intelligence?
Enterprise product-compliance suites cover supply-chain compliance (chemical inventory, REACH, RoHS, conflict minerals) at industrial scale. This skill validates AI-content-output catalog attributes against operator-defined per-vertical rule libraries.
How is this different from PIM-bundled validation (Salsify, Akeneo)?
PIM-bundled modules validate against marketplace spec (Google Shopping required fields, Meta Catalog format). This skill validates against per-vertical regulatory schema (FDA structure-function, FTC substantiation, state-AG cannabis).
How is this different from Veeva Vault or Esko?
Per-vertical specialty tools are deeply verticalized but isolated from marketing operations. This skill composes per-vertical libraries with the canonical product graph and emits validated attributes to every AI content agent.
What per-vertical schemas does the skill validate against?
FDA structure-function (supplements + cosmetics), FTC claim substantiation (all verticals), state-AG cannabis restrictions, FINRA suitability (financial), OSHA chemical labeling, FCC RF compliance (electronics), California Prop 65, NY pricing display requirements, EU Cosmetic Regulation 1223/2009 where applicable.
How does this compose with multi-source-catalog-ingest?
Validation runs at ingest time. Non-compliant attributes route to review queue before reaching the canonical graph.
How does this compose with catalog-change-event-emission?
Validation runs again at emit time. Cannabis-state-specific variants emit only to in-jurisdiction channels.
How does this compose with per-vertical-compliance-overlay?
Per-vertical-compliance-overlay enforces content-output compliance across every AI content-producing agent. This skill validates the underlying catalog data the content agents render. Same rule library; different enforcement layer.

Hire one of the agents that includes this skill